Home » Ancient Posts » Why I Have Little Interest in Trying the Average New RPG    
0 0 votes
Article Rating
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Randall

Hot Soup: If someone does not have the money to buy or the time to study/learn new games willy-nilly, I think it is likely the person would not have the time or money to go to a convention. As much as I would like to go to the North Texas RPG Con (which is right in my own back yard), for example, I've never made it even for a day due to my wife's medical issues. Last year, she had a pain treatment (minor surgery that leaves her unable to do much for a few days). This year, she fell the day before I had planned to go. Etc.

Fuzzy Skinner

This is why I switched from Pathfinder (even the Beginner Box demands a certain amount of rules mastery) to B/X D&D; the other day, I walked a guy who had never played a tabletop game through creating his thief character, and we were finished in less than half an hour. Considering most of my players (and me) are college students, it certainly helps that they don't need to devote time to reading the rulebook, and I can just tell them when a die roll is warranted.

Alas, this means I may never get to run an AD&D 2e campaign… but I can dream.

Gordon Cooper

"Actually, players have no need to ever read (let alone study) the rules unless they just want to as owning and studying the rules for the games I run gives one little or no advantage over players who never learn more about the mechanics than I taught them in their first session."

This is my credo. I think it makes the hobby stronger and more accessible to new or lapsed players.

"In my opinion, the further an RPG strays from this "keep mechanics and play simple enough to play well without knowing the rules" principle the harder task someone who want to play that RPG is likely to have when it comes to recruiting players"

Very true. This is the key.

Gordon Cooper

I like all sorts of role-playing games, new and old, but I have never expected or required my players to buy or read the rules themselves. I consider it my duty as a GM to explain the rules (or house rules as the case may be). That's one reason why I gravitate towards less complicated and more intuitive rules. I want the players to be able to start playing as soon as possible.

"I can teach a new player all the mechanics he really needs to know in 10-15 minutes while I help him create a character and then all he has to do to play in my game is pretend to be that character and tell me what his character is trying to do and I'll report what happens, asking for any die rolls that might be needed."

That's exactly my approach as well. If the players are interested in investing their time and money in rule books, more power to them (especially if they decide they'd like to try GMing), but if they just want to role-play and not worry about the underlying game mechanics, that's perfectly fine, too.

Hot Soup

Hey! I trundled over from the Google+ community.

I don't need to help solve a perceived problem any more than you need to have an excuse not to play new games – there's just as much value in keeping the classics alive as there is trying out the new hot title. But if I can just unload two containers off your train of thought:

"With the boardgame, all I have to do is show up and play. I don't have to invest any time or money in trying the game other than the hour or three it takes to show up and play."

"I believe that one of the reasons I've never had any trouble getting people to play the RPGs I run is that from a player's perspective, playing in one of my campaigns is a lot like playing a boardgame — you can just show up and play."

There it is. If you want to see what the new games are about, don't try to buy them, learn them and run them – you need to find a game already good to go and show up as a player.

You could show up at a convention that hosts Games on Demand (http://www.indiegamesondemand.org/) or hop on G+ Hangouts and play a game online using Roll20, or hell, just convince someone else who has a game to be the GM.

Again, not trying to solve a problem – lack of interest isn't something that needs to be fixed. But if it's not actually lack of interest but lack of accessibility… there are avenues to just pull up a chair and go.